<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Profiler for Xpand/Xtend/Check</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.heikobehrens.net/2009/09/25/profiler-for-xpandxtendcheck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.heikobehrens.net/2009/09/25/profiler-for-xpandxtendcheck/</link>
	<description>11:60 p.m. - my plain thoughts</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Java Blog &#187; Sven Efftinge: Helios M2 of Xtext, Xpand and MWE</title>
		<link>http://www.heikobehrens.net/2009/09/25/profiler-for-xpandxtendcheck/#comment-3668</link>
		<dc:creator>Java Blog &#187; Sven Efftinge: Helios M2 of Xtext, Xpand and MWE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heikobehrens.net/?p=793#comment-3668</guid>
		<description>[...] execution performance of your generator, the new Xpand profiler comes in handy. Heiko already blogged about it. There's also documentation available.MWE (fixed bugzillas)For MWE only some bugs were fixed. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] execution performance of your generator, the new Xpand profiler comes in handy. Heiko already blogged about it. There&#8217;s also documentation available.MWE (fixed bugzillas)For MWE only some bugs were fixed. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Scharf</title>
		<link>http://www.heikobehrens.net/2009/09/25/profiler-for-xpandxtendcheck/#comment-3516</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Scharf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heikobehrens.net/?p=793#comment-3516</guid>
		<description>This is really cool! However, my performance bottleneck with Xpand/Xtend/Check is not the execution of the language but the refresh resources of the entire workspace that the workflow does automatically. I have a huge workspace with &#62; 30,000 files and it takes up to 10 minutes to refresh the entire workspace (if the windows file cache is empty). And even if everything is in the cache it takes 15 seconds.

I have 5 related languages. If I change the 'base language' I have to run 5 workflows which takes between 3 min and 12 min (including stating the workflow, refresh and building the workspace). Only about 40 - 50 seconds are really xtext/xpand/check execution time.

Michael



Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really cool! However, my performance bottleneck with Xpand/Xtend/Check is not the execution of the language but the refresh resources of the entire workspace that the workflow does automatically. I have a huge workspace with &gt; 30,000 files and it takes up to 10 minutes to refresh the entire workspace (if the windows file cache is empty). And even if everything is in the cache it takes 15 seconds.</p>
<p>I have 5 related languages. If I change the &#8216;base language&#8217; I have to run 5 workflows which takes between 3 min and 12 min (including stating the workflow, refresh and building the workspace). Only about 40 - 50 seconds are really xtext/xpand/check execution time.</p>
<p>Michael</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
